Breakout Session 10: Marine Bioinvasions

Breakout Session

10. Marine Bioinvasions

Coordinators: Margaret M. (Peg) Brady, NOAA

Discussants:

1. Dr. Celia Smith, Univ. of Hawaii, Professor of Botany - Physiological ecology of reef algae and corals with related issues in marine ecology
2. Dr. Susan Williams, UC Davis Bodega Marine Laboratory - ecology and management of marine invasive species
3. Dr. Greg Ruiz, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center - senior researcher focusing on invasion biology; population and community ecology; and biogeography.
4. Dr. Tom Stohlgren, Research Ecologist, US Geological Survey; Faculty member, Colorado State University - examining landscape patterns of invasive plant species.

Summary:

Invasive species are second only to habitat destruction as the greatest cause of species endangerment and global biodiversity loss. Invasive species can cause severe and permanent damage to the ecosystems they invade. Consequences of invasion include competition with or predation upon native species, hybridization, carrying or supporting harmful pathogens and parasites that may affect wildlife and human health, disturbing ecosystem function through alteration of food webs and nutrient recycling rates, acting as ecosystem engineers and altering habitat structure, and degradation of the aesthetic quality of our natural resources.  In many cases we may not fully know the native animals and plants, in an area. Invasive species have the potential to permanently change ecosystems before we fully understand the native communities.

Recent studies suggest that invasive species share similar traits that allow for easier establishment in habitats that become disrupted by climate change. Changes in salinity, temperature and pH are just some of the ongoing and expected changes to marine ecosystems that may occur as a result of the interactions between global climate change and biological invasion. Two examples of marine bioinvansions of note are:

• Caulerpa taxifolia, the “killer algae”, is a tropical seaweed that has already been able to invade temperate regions. This algal species has rapidly colonized the Mediterranean, where it covers the bottom and fills the water column with hundreds of tons of plant biomass per hectare. Infestations in California took 6 years and over $7M to eradicate. With warming seas around many temperate coastlines, Caulerpa invasions may become more common. • The Pacific Lionfish (Pterois volitans) was first detected in Florida in 1990s and is now common off the Carolinas. As of 2009, the tropical fish was found in north to Cape Cod during the summer months. Warming conditions probably will permanently expand the range of this fish along much of the eastern coast of the United States. The broad diet of the lionfish suggests that this invasive species may become a real threat to many native reef fish populations through direct predation as well as competition for food resources with native piscivores. Further, its voracious feeding behavior may impact the abundance of ecologically important species such as herbivorous fishes that keep seaweeds and macroalgae from overgrowing corals. Outcomes: • Build upon the National Invasive Species Awareness Conference held in January 2010 which identified recommendations to Fund Research Programs; Increase Coordination; Develop Rapid Response Plans; enhance vector management policies; Expand Educational and Outreach Programs; and, advance a National strategy for monitoring. Resulting Recommendations: The coastal areas of the United States possess some of the world’s most diverse and fragile ecosystems and support numerous species that depend on these habitats for survival. Unfortunately, global climate change, human development, and the continuous degradation of coastal ecosystems have rendered these once pristine areas vulnerable to the introduction of opportunistic invasive species. Invasive species have a profound effect on aquatic ecosystems resulting in the displacement of native species, reduced biodiversity, and the alteration of community structure and food webs. As a result, biological invasion is a significant contributor to marine species endangerment, habitat degradation and global biodiversity loss. In addition to the severe and permanent damage to the habitats they invade, invasive species also adversely affect individuals by hindering economic development. Through damage to human enterprises, invasive species inflict an enormous economic cost; the cost to manage both aquatic and terrestrial species is estimated at$137 billion per year to the U.S. economy alone. This is more than the combined total of all other natural disasters, suggesting that invasive species are a bigger threat than other environmental crises, including global climate change.  It is estimated that a marine species will invade a new environment somewhere in the world on a weekly to daily basis. This rate will continue to increase with global trade and development and is likely to be further augmented by continuing global change, especially climate change. The following recommendations are made to prevent, detect, respond to, and control invasive species in a cost-effective and environmentally sound manner.

Task 1. Reauthorize the National Invasive Species Act.
The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (NANPCA) was intended to identify and implement ways to prevent the unintentional introduction and spread of invasive species into waters of the United States, to work toward minimizing economic and ecological impacts of established nonindigenous species, and to establish a program to assist states in the management and removal of such species. NANPCA was last reauthorized and amended in 1996 by the National Invasive Species Act (NISA); since this time a great deal has been learned about invasive species in regards to their introduction, management, and impact to the environment, economy, and human health. We recommend a reauthorization of NISA to include these additional findings. The Act should also be modified to include authorization of funding for a number of programs including a national monitoring program to document the spread of invasive species, an emergency fund for the rapid response of newly detected invasions, and to perform a comprehensive risk assessment on the vectors of non-native species.

New invasions need to be prevented through coordinated vector management. Further, management goals need to be clearly articulated.  Working with other agencies, NOAA should continuously review the science for evaluating marine bioinvasions vectors.  An invasive species “czar” should be established to coordinate this issue, and others related to invasive species, with other agencies.  All marine vectors need to be evaluated (e.g., magnitude and volume of biota that is moved by different transfer mechanisms).  Management schemes for addressing flux and reducing the propagule pressure should also be addressed.

Task 3. Control and Management of Invasive Species.
In the short-term, plans should be developed for the necessary actions needed to respond quickly to newly detected non-native species that may cause ecosystem, public health and/or socioeconomic impacts. Risk assessments are needed to prioritize species that warrant a rapid response plan. Further, an emergency fund for such efforts should also be established. In the long-term, Federal agencies should develop and implement effective strategies for control and management of invasive species.  As an example, environmentally-sound options should be reviewed for establishing markets for invasive species.

Task 4.  National strategy for monitoring.
When a new species is introduced, the best strategy is early detection and rapid response. This includes monitoring habitats to discover new species soon after introduction, reporting sightings of previously unknown species in an area, and working quickly to keep the species from becoming established and spreading. Extensive monitoring across environments is needed to document the distribution of native species, identify range shifts, and detect invasions. Further, new innovations for early detection should be explored to determine the most efficient, cost-effective means of eradicating new biological invasions.

Expand Educational and Outreach Programs. It is imperative that the public has an understanding of the problems and impacts associated with invasive species so that they can be partners in solving the problem. More importantly, people need to know what they can do to help prevent the introduction and spread of invasive species. Increased funding should be given to support national invasive species campaigns (e.g. HabitattitudeTM and Stop Aquatic Hitchhikers!), that are designed to increase awareness about invasive species and promote actions that empower audiences to become part of the solution in preventing future invasions.

Increased efforts should be incorporated into these campaigns to translate the combined risks from climate change and biological invasion to the public through real-world examples. Additionally, citizen-science needs to be incorporated into invasives species monitoring and management.